![]() To them all relevant criteria (university, academic unit, and department). Submitted by the faculty member and evaluate the candidate's accomplishments, applying The department tenure and promotion committee will review the dossier For promotion to professor, the subcommittee of tenured professors will make the Shall be determined in accordance with Section 4.9.5A(2)(a). The department tenure and promotion committee composition ![]() The tenure and promotion committee of the department consists of all tenured associate Review by Department Tenure and Promotion Committee The tenure and promotion calendar maintained by the provost.Ĥ. With departmental, academic unit, and university guidelines and in accordance with Promotion committee) a dossier of contributions and accomplishments in compliance ![]() The faculty member will, with the guidance and counsel of the department chair, prepareĪnd submit to the department chair (for distribution to the department tenure and Scholarship of the candidate in an objective fashion. The materials sent to a reviewer should enable her/him to fully assess the Related to scholarly activity may be necessary in some departments, and/or academic Note: These are minimal requirements and should be interpreted to mean that additional materials Has access to the external peer evaluation document. a statement that the State of Tennessee has an Open Records Law and that the candidate.the deadline for the written response and.a request for a written response to the question, “In your opinion, has the candidate’sĪccomplishments met or exceeded the expectations for research/scholarship/creative.the departmental expectations for research/scholarship/creative activity.Peer reviewers who have agreed to write letters of evaluation shouldīe sent the candidate's curriculum vitae and a letter from the department chair to A template for the ExternalĮvaluator List which is required for the dossier and a sample request letter for anĮxternal Peer Evaluation shall be maintained by the provost and posted on the university website.Īll reviewers should receive the same materials for evaluation if not, an explanation Therefore, no more than one external reviewerĬan be a past mentor or collaborator of the candidate. The external reviewers are expected to provide informed, objectiveĮvaluations rather than testimonials. His credentials and a statement regarding the nature of the relationship to the candidate ForĮach reviewer, there should be an accompanying brief paragraph identifying her or Obtain four reviews, the reasons must be documented at the departmental level. The dossier should contain at least four external reviews. Solely responsible for supplementing the candidate's list with additional reviewers. The department tenured faculty and department chair are The chairs must select at least one of the names The department chair and the department tenure and promotion committee will developĪ list of external peer reviewers. Of the department and the department tenure and promotion committee. Justifications) of persons who may pose a conflict for consideration by the chairs The candidate may also submit a list (with The candidate shall develop a list, normally four to eight names, of recommended peer Should be initiated during the spring semester preceding the fall tenure and promotion Manner, the process of developing the lists of external reviewers, as described below, The usually busy schedules of the evaluators. Should review applicants for promotion to professor. Will have a higher rank than the candidate being reviewed. Member from another institution is selected as a peer reviewer, the faculty reviewer Though not an absolute requirement, it is also expected that when a faculty Will be selected from organizations with national reputations for excellence in theįaculty member’s discipline and that the majority of the reviewers will be academic It is expected that the external reviewers To provide an informed objective evaluation of the quality of the scholarship, research The purpose of external peer reviews is solely Peer review of a candidate's record of scholarly activity by qualified peers who are In academic units, without departments, theĬandidate will notify the dean in writing of his/her intent to file for tenure and/orīoth tenure and/or promotion to associate professor or professor require external The candidate will notify the department chair in writing of his/her intent to fileįor tenure and/or promotion to the department no later than the deadline indicated Review and Recommendation by Department Chair.Vote of Department T&P Review Committee.Review by Department T&P Review Committee.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |